Showing posts with label seafield. Show all posts
Showing posts with label seafield. Show all posts

Monday, July 25, 2011

Hey, remember when James West bullshitted the world about Seafield Resources (SFF.v)....

...and told everyone that it was "the next Ventana Gold" without even understanding the first thing about the drill results it published back then?



Well it's not.
The last nail in this dog's coffin came this morning, with the publication of the remaining holes in West's Hail Mary pass, the Dosquebradas zone at the site. Ain't going nowhere guys, not with the grades you found.

So the only question remaining is to why why it always falls to IKN to call bullshit on the snake-oil salesmen of this world such as James West? C'mon guys, somebody else wanna do this job too?

Friday, June 17, 2011

James West bails on his pump'n'dump dog Seafield (SFF.v) as well as 27 other juniors

A bottom signal if there ever was one, scamball pumper James West has had enough of the market and has just called sell on a whole bunch of his picks. Here's number one of the list of 28, Seafield Resources (SFF.v), the one he said "accumulate to $1" without knowing anything about the BS drill pump job.
Sell the dogs:
1. Seafield Ventures Ltd. (TSX.V:SFF)
We learned that the CEO and CFO, Tony Roodenburg and James Pirie, doubled their own severance pay this year prior to being replaced as management.
Unethical, for sure, and possibly illegal. We are going to break this story next week, so I’m saying get out of Dodge while you still can, cause this could really take the share price lower.

It's hilarious to hear a scumbag pumper like West talk about "unethical" behaviour. Look in the mirror, dumbass. DYODD and don't listen to the market charlatans. Above information supplied by A. Friend.

Monday, May 16, 2011

So why isn't the bullshit pumper James West talking about Seafield Resources (SFF.v) any longer?

Oh yeah, that must be why:


The only thing left to ask is, CUI BONO, JIMMYLAD? CUI BONO? Meanwhile, your author's memory is stirred by this post dated December 6th that presaged the drop in this scam. It read as follows:


Seafield (SFF.v): Gotta wonder just how stupid James West is going to look once the hype dies down

The subject matter is Seafield Resources (SFF.v) and its big hole announced last week. This excerpt from James West's Midas Letter dates from December 3rd.
"When the market opens Monday, any shares you can get under a dollar will likely be ten-bagger potential, as with a few more drills holes like this one, and you’ve got Ventana 2 on your hands. (Ventana is currently the subject of a buyout offer by Brazil’s EBX Group for $1.5 Billion.)"

The market looks upon West as a guru. I personally remember him as the dumbass who looked really really stupid by reco'ing Southwestern as a buy just AFTER the Boka scandal broke. Meanwhile, this on SFF.v last week is from the smart guys at Metal Augmentor: For the record, put me firmly in their camp as regards Seafield:
"I’d go as far as saying that anybody who compares Seafield to Ventana Gold (TSX: VEN; Pink Sheets: VENGF) at this point hasn’t even bothered to look at the drill map."

DYODD dude, and laugh hard at self-fulfilling prophecies.

Yup, once upon a six months ago James West peppered his flock with ridiculous "buy at a buck and sell at $5" prophecies for this stock. My how time flies....
 
Remember James West's advice that geology doesn't matter folks

Thursday, March 10, 2011

What a mining professional thinks of James West

So today I get mailed by 'Wiley', a mining pro from up North (anonymity is part of the gig with this post folks, which is the way it is but I stand by the source in question and the info contained totally after doing the necessary backchecking). The mail was prompted by IKN's recent coverage of pal James West, bullshit promo pump artist and the guy behind the recent transfer of wealth between the retail investment community and those at Seafield Resources (SFF.v), and went into detail about Wiley's knowledge and experience of James.

His mail was so good that I asked this peer respected mining pro whether we could run it on the blog. What results is an altered version of the first mail, still containing plenty of the original but by necessity removing some of the more personal intel and also clues to the ID of Wiley. So here it is:

"I am a geo, working up north. A few years back I spent a regrettable half-day with "guru" James West, who at the time was a consultant in how to formulate a strategy for optimally pumping a junior mining stock. His method mainly involved making sure the headline for every press release always contained large numbers - the maximum possible for grade, width, whatever. He did not seem at all interested in any geological or logistical aspects of the project. Just how to manipulate the stock price upward (or keep it up) over a period of several months by a planned sequence of news releases, within the context of a good overall story.
Anyways, the guy is a total ass. Very rude, obnoxious, aggressive and with a ridiculous amount of phony-seeming macho. He knows very little about exploration or mining, just about telling "fairy" tales about junior companies." Wiley.

Just so you know what real mining people think of this charlatan. Also, doesn't that James West strategy marked out by Wiley ring right on the button when you look at how the SFF.v pump unfolded?


So the stock West screamed "accumulate to $1" in the December pumpo now trades at 33c. Funny dat, innit? DYODD.

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Seafield's mgmt team didn't get James West's memo

According to his own publication, James West has been busy buying up all the share of Seafield (SFF.v) he could buy. He's probably still buying big chunks in fact, what with his "accumulate to $1" call on the stock. Luckily for him there's no liquidity problems in the stock as he's found some willing sellers...namely the mgmt team itself:

Seafield Resources Ltd. (SFF)

As of December 15th, 2010
Filing Date Transaction Date Insider Name Ownership Type Securities Nature of transaction # or value acquired or disposed of Unit Price
Dec 14/10 Dec 10/10 Pirie, James Direct Ownership Common Shares 10 - Disposition in the public market -300,000 $0.610
Dec 14/10 Dec 09/10 Pirie, James Direct Ownership Common Shares 54 - Exercise of warrants 200,000 $0.160
Dec 14/10 Dec 09/10 Pirie, James Direct Ownership Warrants 54 - Exercise of warrants -140,000  
Dec 14/10 Dec 09/10 Pirie, James Direct Ownership Warrants 54 - Exercise of warrants -60,000  
Dec 14/10 Dec 09/10 Pirie, James Direct Ownership Common Shares 10 - Disposition in the public market -350,000 $0.610
Dec 13/10 Dec 09/10 Roodenburg, Anthony Ralph Direct Ownership Common Shares 10 - Disposition in the public market -1,000,000 $0.600
Dec 13/10 Dec 09/10 Roodenburg, Anthony Ralph Direct Ownership Common Shares 54 - Exercise of warrants 600,000 $0.160
Dec 13/10 Dec 09/10 Roodenburg, Anthony Ralph Direct Ownership Common Shares 54 - Exercise of warrants 250,000 $0.100
Dec 13/10 Dec 09/10 Roodenburg, Anthony Ralph Direct Ownership Warrants 54 - Exercise of warrants -400,000  
Dec 13/10 Dec 09/10 Roodenburg, Anthony Ralph Direct Ownership Warrants 54 - Exercise of warrants -200,000

So either this West character is stupid and was buying stock at all prices over 60c that's deemed expensive by Seafield's (SFF.v) very own management, or he's in cahoots with them. You be the judge,  but I just think he's plain dumb stupid personally. By way of evidence look no further than the way he was caught with his pants round his ankles re SFF on December 3rd and wasn't even able to read and interpret the simplest of drill maps.

Mind you, he did do the same thing when pumping Mosquito (MSQ.v) a while back...funny how that call didn't work out for him, either. Nah....I'm thinking about this too much...the dude is just stupid.

Saturday, December 11, 2010

Seafield (SFF.v), meet owly: Owly, this is Seafield

Got a lot of bills to pay, that Paterson guy.......

Seafield Resources Ltd. (SFF)

As of December 10th, 2010
Filing Date Transaction Date Insider Name Ownership Type Securities Nature of transaction # or value acquired or disposed of Unit Price
Dec 10/10 Dec 06/10 Paterson, James Direct Ownership Common Shares 10 - Disposition in the public market -300,000 $0.705

Thursday, December 9, 2010

In a perverse way I admire them

The sheer brass neck of these people goes way past the ingrained, inner cynic and gets me close to applause. It's certainly funny. What's going on at Seafield Resources (SFF.v) isn't some opportunistic move to take advantage of a sudden shift in market appeal; it's a well-planned, well executed orchestra of several moving parts involving, thought, strategy, main players and side-acts. It's all legal too, but it's also one helluva scam. Here's today's NR below and your humble scribe has taken the time to mark in blue those members of the deal who will not be holding any sort of bag when the music stops. Meanwhile those marked in red should remember an age-old phrase; caveat emptor. By way of disclosure, no position in SFF.v and wild horses couldn't change that.

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - Dec. 9, 2010) - Seafield Resources Ltd. (the "Company") (TSX VENTURE:SFF - News) is pleased to announce that it intends to complete a private placement offering of up to 16,000,000 units ("Units) at a price of $0.50 per Unit, for gross proceeds of up $8,000,000 (the "Offering"). Each Unit will consist of one common share (a "Common Share") of the Company and one common share purchase warrant (a "Warrant") with each Warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase a Common Share at an exercise price of $0.75 for a period of two years following the closing of the Offering.
In addition, the Company intends to pay finder's fees to parties that refer subscribers to the Company equal to 6% of the proceeds of the Offering and will also issue broker warrants equal to 6% of the number of Units issued pursuant to the Offering. Each broker warrant will entitle the holder to acquire a Unit for a period of two years from the date of issuance exercisable at a price of $0.50 per Unit.
Proceeds of the Offering will be used to advance the Company's Quinchia, gold property in Colombia and for general working capital purposes.

PS: In the blog we'll just leave it at the rant, but the numbercrunching to illustrate just why the promo is getting people to overpay for SFF will happen in this weekend's edition of The IKN Weekly, the place where the level-headed stuff goes on.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Brent Cook on Seafield Resources (SFF.v)

Brent Cook's Exploration Insights letter last Sunday devoted part of its space to last week's news release out of Seafield Resources (SFF.v). Your humble scribe has received permission to reproduce Cook's thoughts here at IKN, so here they are below. What follows, ladies and gentlemen, is the difference between hucksters that pretend to know about drilling results and professional geologists who do actually know what the hell they're talking about. Enjoy Cook's analysis.

Influential newsletter writers and Seafield’s big hole
...........
Speaking of investment letter writers, I understand that the Midas Letter is calling Seafield Resources (SFF.TSX-V) the next Ventana, and advises that you grab as much as you can with both hands at under $1.00.  Ventana Gold (VEN.TSX) has a 3.5 million ounce inferred gold resource in Colombia and is the subject of a takeover offer of approximately $1.5 billion.  Seafield, or Ventana II if you prefer, announced a drill intersection of 449 meters grading 1.29 grams per tonne gold including 10 meters @ 2.87 g/t Au, and 23.95 meters @ 9.18 g/t Au.  Within the higher grade section was a 2-meter interval grading 70 grams per tonne gold.  SFF (~99 million shares outstanding and ~146 million fully diluted) popped from $0.23 to $0.57 on huge volume of 70 million shares after it opened for trading on Friday. 
I reviewed the results and the well-written 43-101 after the drill hole announcement, and since I received a number of queries from subscribers, offer the following quick and dirty review of the Miraflores property in Colombia.
The property has seen a number of drill campaigns from several exploration companies, the most recent being B2 Gold, in 2007.  The historical work, plus a report from the renowned economic geologist Richard Sillitoe concluded that Miraflores is a multi-phase magmatic-hydrothermal breccia.  Meaning, the mineralization is confined to a fractured and broken pipe-like body formed by the injection of several magmas and hydrothermal fluids related to these intrusives. There are three alteration and mineralization phases, of which it appears that an early silica and base metal event is associated with the better gold mineralization.  Drilling, mapping, and underground sampling have essentially defined the limits of the body at about 250 meters by 280 meters.  Although the breccia body is open to depth, drilling suggests that the better gold mineralization is concentrated in the upper 250 meters or so.  There is some evidence that a high grade core dipping to the southwest could extend the mineralization to depth in one direction.  
In April 2010 SFF estimated an inferred resource, based on approximately ten drill holes and underground sampling, of 776,373 ounces grading 1.295 grams per tonne gold for the Miraflores breccia pipe.  The resource report noted that the high grade mineralization within the body occurred mostly within a central core and was both erratically distributed and nuggety (localized very high grade gold that is difficult to model in a resource estimate).  The highest grades (3 to 429 g/t Au) occurred in fault veins, and mineralization generally decreased towards the edges of the breccia body. 
Our handy-dandy drill interval calculator (pictured below) reveals that, excluding the two higher grade intervals in DH-03, the SFF announcement of 449 meters grading 1.29 grams per tonne gold consists of 415 meters grading 0.798 grams per tonne gold plus the two high grade sections.  Within the higher grade, 23.9 meter interval, there is a 2-meter section grading 70 grams per tonne gold.  This narrow interval alone has a significant influence on the entire 449 meter interval, such that when excluded the grade drops to just under 1g/t Au for the remaining 447 meters.  DH-03 went through the guts of the breccia pipe, and the drill results are representative of the deposit-- basically they confirm the previous drilling and resource estimate.  Hmm…this is not looking good.

(Fig. 1- Breakdown of Seafield’s 449 meters grading 1.29 g/t Au)
In summary, all the excitement is over a single drill hole that really offers minimal new information on a gold deposit that has been effectively defined by previous work.  Miraflores is a discrete breccia pipe hosting a decent resource centered around a higher grade core.  There may be the potential to add ounces at depth to the southwest as indicated by the deeper interval announced by SFF this week.  It is difficult to tell how much of the resource could be economically mined because the deposit rests on the side of a steep hill; developing the deeper portions could entail the removal of a significant amount of barren rock (high strip ratio). 
Although the upside to the Miraflores property may lie in as yet undiscovered or undrilled targets, that upside existed at $0.23, and has nothing to do with the 449 meters grading 1.29 grams per tonne gold or, the 415 meters grading 0.798 grams per tonne gold plus a couple of high grade intervals.  This is not Ventana II, and Miraflores is not a large enough deposit to entice me.  If other gold in soil anomalies on the property noted in an October 6 news release are the real sex to this play, then it is best to really look at the historical results and wait until SFF begins releasing additional data from those targets.  Considering that a single drill hole through a known deposit caused over two-thirds of SFF’s outstanding shares to trade hands in one day, one has to wonder who made the better trade, buyers or sellers.  Monday’s action should prove interesting.

Seafield (SFF.v) sound effects

"FSSSSSSSSSSSSSST" (sound of air escaping from fatally flawed, overpumped tire).


So James West, tell us the truth: Are you still holding out for that "potential 10 bagger" and buying all the stock available today (well) under 55c, or have you decided, after talking to Ian Park, that it's prudent to take some profits given market conditions*? Inquiring minds.....



*YOU THERE! STOP LAUGHING AT THE BACK!

Monday, December 6, 2010

Seafield (SFF.v): Gotta wonder just how stupid James West is going to look once the hype dies down

The subject matter is Seafield Resources (SFF.v) and its big hole announced last week. This excerpt from James West's Midas Letter dates from December 3rd.
"When the market opens Monday, any shares you can get under a dollar will likely be ten-bagger potential, as with a few more drills holes like this one, and you’ve got Ventana 2 on your hands. (Ventana is currently the subject of a buyout offer by Brazil’s EBX Group for $1.5 Billion.)"

The market looks upon West as a guru. I personally remember him as the dumbass who looked really really stupid by reco'ing Southwestern as a buy just AFTER the Boka scandal broke. Meanwhile, this on SFF.v last week is from the smart guys at Metal Augmentor: For the record, put me firmly in their camp as regards Seafield:
"I’d go as far as saying that anybody who compares Seafield to Ventana Gold (TSX: VEN; Pink Sheets: VENGF) at this point hasn’t even bothered to look at the drill map."

DYODD dude, and laugh hard at self-fulfilling prophecies.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

IKN's top tip of the day for filtering junior mining companies

Today's top tip:

NEVER INVEST IN A COMPANY THAT DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO SPELL THE NAME OF THE COUNTRY IN WHICH IT OPERATES

EXHIBIT ONE:
About Seafield Resources Ltd.
Seafield Resources Ltd. is a precious metals exploration company with assets located in Colombia, Mexico and Ontario. The Company's flagship project in Columbia is the Quinchia Gold Project, which contains a 43-101 compliant resource of 778,000 ounces gold.

Seafield (SFF.v) has those ounces. It has 95m shares out, a market cap of  $24.7m, cash at bank of $4m at end June. It has also been discarded as a possible chez Otto because life is just too short.