Showing posts with label The Economist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Economist. Show all posts

Sunday, August 29, 2010

lest we forget

Your author makes no apology whatsoever in reprinting every single word in this Economist article. If just one extra person reads the words on offer it would have been worth the copyright risk.


Piping in D-Day

Bill Millin, piper at the D-Day landings, died on August 17th, aged 88

ANY reasonable observer might have thought Bill Millin was unarmed as he jumped off the landing ramp at Sword Beach, in Normandy, on June 6th 1944. Unlike his colleagues, the pale 21-year-old held no rifle in his hands. Of course, in full Highland rig as he was, he had his trusty skean dhu, his little dirk, tucked in his right sock. But that was soon under three feet of water as he waded ashore, a weary soldier still smelling his own vomit from a night in a close boat on a choppy sea, and whose kilt in the freezing water was floating prettily round him like a ballerina’s skirt.

But Mr Millin was not unarmed; far from it. He held his pipes, high over his head at first to keep them from the wet (for while whisky was said to be good for the bag, salt water wasn’t), then cradled in his arms to play. And bagpipes, by long tradition, counted as instruments of war. An English judge had said so after the Scots’ great defeat at Culloden in 1746; a piper was a fighter like the rest, and his music was his weapon. The whining skirl of the pipes had struck dread into the Germans on the Somme, who had called the kilted pipers “Ladies from Hell”. And it raised the hearts and minds of the home side, so much so that when Mr Millin played on June 5th, as the troops left for France past the Isle of Wight and he was standing on the bowsprit just about keeping his balance above the waves getting rougher, the wild cheers of the crowd drowned out the sound of his pipes even to himself.

His playing had been planned as part of the operation. On commando training near Fort William he had struck up a friendship with Lord Lovat, the officer in charge of the 1st Special Service Brigade. Not that they had much in common. Mr Millin was short, with a broad cheeky face, the son of a Glasgow policeman; his sharpest childhood memory was of being one of the “poor”, sleeping on deck, on the family’s return in 1925 from Canada to Scotland. Lovat was tall, lanky, outrageously handsome and romantic, with a castle towering above the river at Beauly, near Inverness. He had asked Mr Millin to be his personal piper: not a feudal but a military arrangement. The War Office in London now forbade pipers to play in battle, but Mr Millin and Lord Lovat, as Scots, plotted rebellion. In this “greatest invasion in history”, Lovat wanted pipes to lead the way.

He was ordering now, as they waded up Sword Beach, in that drawly voice of his: “Give us a tune, piper.” Mr Millin thought him a mad bastard. The man beside him, on the point of jumping off, had taken a bullet in the face and gone under. But there was Lovat, strolling through fire quite calmly in his aristocratic way, allegedly wearing a monogrammed white pullover under his jacket and carrying an ancient Winchester rifle, so if he was mad Mr Millin thought he might as well be ridiculous too, and struck up “Hielan’ Laddie”. Lovat approved it with a thumbs-up, and asked for “The Road to the Isles”. Mr Millin inquired, half-joking, whether he should walk up and down in the traditional way of pipers. “Oh, yes. That would be lovely.”

Three times therefore he walked up and down at the edge of the sea. He remembered the sand shaking under his feet from mortar fire and the dead bodies rolling in the surf, against his legs. For the rest of the day, whenever required, he played. He piped the advancing troops along the raised road by the Caen canal, seeing the flashes from the rifle of a sniper about 100 yards ahead, noticing only after a minute or so that everyone behind him had hit the deck in the dust. When Lovat had dispatched the sniper, he struck up again. He led the company down the main street of Bénouville playing “Blue Bonnets over the Border”, refusing to run when the commander of 6 Commando urged him to; pipers walked as they played.

He took them across two bridges, one (later renamed the Pegasus Bridge) ringing and banging as shrapnel hit the metal sides, one merely with railings which bullets whistled through: “the longest bridge I ever piped across.” Those two crossings marked their successful rendezvous with the troops who had preceded them. All the way, he learned later, German snipers had had him in their sights but, out of pity for this madman, had not fired. That was their story. Mr Millin himself knew he wasn’t going to die. Piping was too enjoyable, as he had discovered in the Boys’ Brigade band and all through his short army career. And piping protected him.


The Nut-Brown Maiden

The pipes themselves were less lucky, injured by shrapnel as he dived into a ditch. He could still play them, but four days later they took a direct hit on the chanter and the drone when he had laid them down in the grass, and that was that. The last tune they had piped on D-Day was “The Nut-Brown Maiden”, played for a small red-haired French girl who, with her folks cowering behind her, had asked him for music as he passed their farm.

He gave the pipes later to the museum at the Pegasus Bridge, which he often revisited, and sometimes piped across, during his long and quiet post-war career as a mental nurse at Dawlish in Devon. On one such visit, in full Highland rig with his pipes in his arms, he was approached by a smartly dressed woman of a certain age, with faded red hair, who planted a joyous kiss of remembrance on his cheek.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

The Economist, back to its normal LatAm mediocrity

I've had occasion to say "yup, good job" about a couple of recent reports in The Economist. This was quite pleasant to do, too, as TE gets about a quadzillion more eyeballs laid upon its pages than this humble corner of cyberspace and the bottom line is that any article that helps tell it like it is down here is fine by me....I mean, even Simon Rosemary has been applauded on these virtual pages in the past when he gets one right.

But back to The Economist and like all good things its good run of articles has come to an end with this piece of junk about Bolivia. Unshockingly it hits all the usual targets, like the fact that it is in fact bad for Bolivia to have a president that's popular with Bolivians, etc etc (thank God for intellectuals, else we'd never realize these counterintuitive things). There's every single cliché available, really; Chávez is mentioned...there's Russia...got a bit of Iran. But then it goes off on a tack about Santa Cruz by saying
"...but in fact Santa Cruz is ethnically mixed and average incomes in the two cities are comparable."
That made me laugh. Yeah...errr....any of those little brown people in the ruling elite of Santa Cruz, Mr/s. Economistwriter (they don't do bylines at TE...we're left guessing as always)? Err...any mention of how the 2008 referendum vote in Santa Cruz went pro-Evo Morales in Santa Cruz ex-city? And then there's the slave and virtual slave labour (Oxfam and WHO dixit, not I) that line the pockets of blue-eyed-whitey. As for "comparable incomes" what's the benchmark here, La Paz, New York, Santa Cruz, Buenos Aires and Tokyo? Gotta love those statistics, boys.....

But then it gets really mondo bizarro as TE goes where only dumbasses tread, trying to use a bit of revisionism on the Santa Cruz terrorist cell that was broken up when its integrants decided to stop some government bullets with their chests. They go with the "killed in their beds" line that suggests execution when forensic evidence has proven, no doubt, no flimflam, there was a full-on firefight. TE tells us "the supposed terrorists were an unlikely bunch" which may be true, but they're also proven far-right wing gunsmiths that are on tape as saying they wanted to kill Evo, his Veep, his security minister and cause a insurgency to break Santa Cruz away from the rest of Bolivia. They were funded by the Santa Cruz elite, they had a cache of weaponry that can officially be classed as "a shitload", they bombed the house of the nation's best-loved Catholic bishop and they were staying at the best hotels in town free of charge because......because.......TE doesn't try explaining any of that. When it comes to TE you expect a bit of lean towards capitalism, but not outright lies and the refusal to let overwhelming evidence stain the pre-conceived thrust of the argument. Y'know, things like photos, sworn statements, audiotapes, computer files....just trivia according to the lying drivelwriter working for TE.

At the end, The Economist (being The Economist) signs off with a nod to Bolivia's...well, it's economy. We get some un-named fool who is simply referred to as "one pundit" (hey, maybe it's Alek Boyd!! Maybe it's Fausta!! Maybe it's Goni!!) who tells us, amongst other things, that Bolivia is suffering from "bad economic policy"? Well let's see what our friend the owl thinks about that, shall we?
Yep, a special jolly good show British version of our friend the owl for the blokes over at The Economist. Here's a checklist on Bolivia's economy under Evo Morales:

  • 2007 GDP up 4.6%
  • 2008 GDP up 6.15%
  • 2009 GDP expected to grow "at least 4%"
  • U$8Bn in international currency reserves, which is all-time record levels and represents U$816 per capita.
  • Inflation now under control. The last two months have seen negative inflation thanks mainly to the drop in imported foodstuffs.
  • Expansion of exports despite losing the ATPDEA advantages with the USA. New and very large investment programs in hydrocarbons and metals in exactly the way those economists say you should do these things (except it's China, Brazil and India invited to the parties, not the US...perhaps related?)
  • An old age pension given to every single senior citizen regardless of sex, status or history for the first time ever. Poverty rates dropping at record speed.
  • Programs that have rid the country of illiteracy by official UN world standards.
  • Free heathcare that is so popular visitors come from "the economic miracle" Peru to get their eyes fixed.
  • etc

I could continue. But perhaps from all that list the "GDP +4% in 2009" is the killer stat, because if achieved (and that seems very likely the way things are going) Bolivia will have the best performing economy in the whole of South America in 2009. So what kind of crow will the author of this most pathetic of hit pieces in The Economist have to eat come the end of 2009 and the magazine's learned audience starts writing in with "Hey, if Bolivia's in bad shape what about the rest?". Or maybe the author is just full of shit...YOU BE THE JUDGE!

Thus, unnamed yet shamed Economist author, for your ridiculously slanted piece on Bolivia that manages to combine a mass of errors of omission with everything you can possible get wrong about the country in the true spirit of neolib hit-jobs in the space of just 740 words, you win this week's coveted award. Enjoy, dumbass:


Thursday, June 25, 2009

Cocaine: Good article in The Economist


Y'know sometimes The Economist talks crap on LatAm, sometimes it doesn't. When it doesn't it's a good place to go to get a snappy, concise view of issues down here and I'm glad to say that this report on the cocaine business is one of The Economist's better efforts. In not-so-many words it manages to get the nuanced view (not black'n'white like the normal dumbass reporting on LatAm in English) and also add up figures correctly (more than others bother to do).

Meanwhile, to emphasize that Bolivia really is doing a good job in cracking down on smugglers, another story hit today which tells how its FELCN drug enforcement agents took days to stake out a gang and then finally moved in, arresting an Italian, a Peruvian and ten Bolivians along with 232 kilos of marching powder. All without the aid of a safety net or the US DEA (often involved with the smuggling, not the arresting).

Finally, although clearly biased in favour of Evo's team I do like this headline from BoliviaSol today. "The Allies of the USA are the World's Biggest Producers of Cocaine". I like it cos it's true and it cuts to the chase.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

The Summit of the Americas: A primer


"The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about."
Oscar Wilde

Thanks to The Economist, IKN no longer feels obliged to writing a long preview of next week's Summit of the Americas that happens in Trinidad and Tobago on April 17th to 19th. Here's the link to the Economist article, recommended as a nice'n'concise way to get the issues clear before the bunfest starts (top of agenda will be Cuba, Cuba, Cuba and sadassed Miami residents' rabid reaction to Cuba) and also gives a neat background to the fiasco (The Economist's word, not mine) of the last SotA in Argentina, 2005.

Finally, while checking out the script make sure you note something about the illustration that accompanies. As well as the attention to detail (Lula's missing finger) the Canadian dude is so unknown outside his borders that the cartoonist feels obliged to slap a red&white maple leaf on his tie. Sad, innit?

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Readables


Biiwii Gary on gold stocks today. If you haven't read this already, go now. Excellent insight.

Paul Krugman on real balance effects. When a Nobel prizewinner takes time to explain these normally out-of-reach concepts to us mortals, take time to read it. This is the goodstuff and good map-marking for next year.

The Economist on Peru. Every now and again, the mediocre LatAm coverage in The Economist is enlightened by a decent piece of script. It happened today. This is a good snapshot of Peru.

Trend and Value on the Aussie dollar. Look, this guy knows his stuff when it comes to trading currencies, and all of a sudden the OzDollar (or pound or Peso, or waddeva they have over there) has lit his fire. There are three or four recent posts on the AUD to check out. So do so.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Is this the worst ever note on LatAm from The Economist?

The Economist has always been lacklustre in its regional coverage, but this note linked right here, full of half-truths and revisionist history (example " Mr Goldberg’s offence was merely to have met opposition governors.".........LOL!!!) on the state of play between Bolivia and the USA really takes the biscuit. Don't they know that Goldberg is in the caca in his own State Dep't due to the way he cocked it up in Bolivia? Even this humble blogger knows more than The Economist about the latest developments, it seems. The Economist may cover other parts of the world well, but in LatAm it has royally sucked for years and there's nothing to suggest the pattern is about to change, either.

The thing that annoys is that there are plenty of informed people all over the globe that trust The Economist implicitly; it never crosses their minds that their fave magazine would try to unduly spin and influence their opinion. Nah...these clowns actually think the tail wags the dog; they think they can read The Economist then form their own informed opinion a posteriori.

Delusion.

If you want to know what has really been happening in Bolivia and the dirty tricks being used by the US and its propaganda machine, just click the name "Philip Goldberg" on the tagline under here. Or better still, click here and go to Abiding In Bolivia because El Duderino knocks spots off the MSM when it comes to Bolivia coverage.

PS: corvad, otto.rock1 (AT) gmail (dot) com