Showing posts with label united states. Show all posts
Showing posts with label united states. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

OT: US to Host World Press Freedom Day in 2011

I laughed so much reading this that I just can't resist sharing. Today the US State Department announced the following and we're just going to present the NR without further comment:

"The United States is pleased to announce that it will host UNESCO’s World Press Freedom Day event in 2011, from May 1 - May 3 in Washington, D.C. UNESCO is the only UN agency with the mandate to promote freedom of expression and its corollary, freedom of the press."

It goes on:
"The theme for next year’s commemoration will be 21st Century Media: New Frontiers, New Barriers. The United States places technology and innovation at the forefront of its diplomatic and development efforts. New media has empowered citizens around the world to report on their circumstances, express opinions on world events, and exchange information in environments sometimes hostile to such exercises of individuals’ right to freedom of expression."

And then:
"At the same time, we are concerned about the determination of some governments to censor and silence individuals, and to restrict the free flow of information."

This is not a spoof, nor is it a joke. The whole NR can be read right here.

x

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Chart of the day is....

.....this....
...which compares to this story yesterday.
The United States said Monday an ongoing military buildup by Venezuela poses a serious challenge to regional stability. The comments follow an announcement that the Caracas government of President Hugo Chavez has received a line of credit from Moscow to purchase Russian tanks and anti-aircraft missiles.

No further comment.

UPDATE: Kind reader 'MH' left a comment with this link to a BBC report that has the "embattled Chávez" (58% approval rating missed out of report, surprisingly) mentioned time and time again. If you read through to the end and get your eyes to gloss over the normal BS rhetoric, the writer does actually get close to the truth. But the biggest lump of ridiculousness is yet another analyst trying to create some some of friction and rivalry between Lula's Brazil and Chávez's Venezuela. This is the stuff of Rory Carroll's wet dreams and forms no part of reality. We laugh at you when you talk funny, gringos.

But the denouement of the report gives the whole game away. Right at the foot of the page we have that destabilizing Venezuela in context via this chart. Isn't it amazing how the US forgets to mention Colombia's arms purchases...

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Hawaiian Heart Studmuffin

rafa

Here's the
link to the official White House communiqué (to prove I'm not making this up). I like how the serious politicos ignore the crap spewed by Oppenheimer&Co and recognize a vibrant democracy that has a free and independent press. No word on whether Studmuffin made any comments about the foxiness of Michelle or whether The Hawaiian got defensive and told The Muffin to back the hell off.

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary
_____________________________________________
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 11, 2009

Statement by the Press Secretary on the President’s call with President Rafael Correa of Ecuador

The President spoke with President Correa yesterday to congratulate him on his recent reelection and to commend the people of Ecuador for their commitment to democracy. The President stated his desire to deepen our bilateral relationship and to maintain an ongoing dialogue that can ensure a productive relationship based on mutual respect. President Obama expressed his support for a vibrant democracy in Ecuador that includes a free and independent press as the means of promoting human prosperity, security and dignity, which are important goals for both of our countries and for the people of the Americas.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Citigroup and Banamex: There's a fight brewing


The Mex Files has a post up that notes the Mexican angle to last week's news about Citigroup giving 36% of itself over to the US Government. RG starts his note by saying that it's a story you probably won't get to read North of the Rio Grande.

I beg to differ. I think it might become a very big story indeed.

The nub of the issue revolves around Mexican law, which states in crystalline manner that foreign governments cannot own more than 10% of any bank that operates inside Mexico. It's as clear as a bell and on the statute. So as Banamex is a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup (C paid $12.1Bn or so back in 2001 for the bank) if the US Gov't takes its 36% stake in Citigroup then it will be a larger-than-10% shareholder of Banamex, something against Mexican law. Won't it?

Well, maybe yes and maybe no. It was interesting that Citi's CEO, Vikram "still got a job" Pandit, spent two days down Mexico way earlier this month. He met with the bank honchos of course, but also gov't lackeys and the regulator dudes too, so we hear. He also made it very plain that Citigroup plans to hold on to Banamex, saying things like the Banamex is Citi and Citi is Banamex and may sacred matrimory reign etc etc. Pandit dixit Feb 20th 2009:

"I want to make it very clear: Citi and Banamex are one and the same......The future of Citi is in emerging markets. It’s in Latin America. It’s in Mexico with Banamex.”

So with last week's Citigroup/US Gov't announcement that already has Mexican officialdom and opposition politicos smelling blood, it's worth noting how Pandit recently split C into two parts, namely Citi Holdings (all the bad stuff) and Citicorp (all the retail banking things that are profitable and everyone likes, including Banamex).

So here's the question that's been itching at me all weekend: Do Citigroup's intentions regarding Banamex signal that the US Gov't is only (or majority) buying into Citi Holdings, the toxic end of C?

It's intriguing. It would be an über-underhand move concealed from the market so far and would cause uproar if the news hit. If it is true, then the US taxpayer is getting an even worse deal than s/he thought. In fact, it would likely make Uncle Sam the majority holder in the toxic bank to end all toxic banks. However it does fit the Citigroup line that says Banamex is safe and not in any legal trouble and will stay part of C.

However, if in all likelihood it's not true and the US gov't is getting 36% of the whole shebang, Citigroup is undoubtedly breaking Mexican law by holding onto ownership of Banamex. So either Mexico changes the law to suit present circumstances (possible, though it will be an absolute political field day for Calderon's opposition) or Banamex will have to be sold to a third party, something that Pandit clearly doesn't want to happen.

Already there are overtures being made by other banks, which isn't surprising because unlike its lamentable parent company Banamex is a well-managed and highly profitable bank. I'd go as far as to say that Banamex is quite the jewel in the Citigroup crown and as such a prized asset that would be a major loss for both C and Pandit. But sharks are circling all right. For example here's an AP report noting Brazil's Itau is interested in the asset.

The price tag being bandied around the market right now is something in the region of U$12Bn to US$15Bn, meaning that Citigroup would most probably walk away with its original investment money (not to mention the eight years of profits generated by the subsidiary). Let's see how the story develops, but you have to wonder if Banamex is the canary in Pandit's coalmine. After all the moves and sounds made by Pandit this month any eventual sale of Banamex might become the straw that breaks the camel's back* and sees him "being resigned".

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Appendix: A few stats about Banamex as culled from the C website. This gives you an idea as to why Pandit wants to keep a tight hold.
  • 1,233 branches
  • 28,759 employees
  • 4,492 ATMs
  • 7.9 million credit cards
  • 2.6 million checking cccounts
  • 20.52% of all assets in the Mexican banking system
But wait! There's more!
  • Seguros Banamex (Insurance): 5th largest Mexican insurance company
  • Afore Banamex (Pension Funds): Mexico's largest private pension fund with over 4 million affiliates
  • Accival - Acciones y Valores de México (Brokerage House): Top Brokerage of the country holding 16% of assets

UPDATE Monday 1pm: Here's a great little quote in an e-mail just received from Mexican political expert and owner of The Mex Files blog, RG:

"Yesterday's Jornada quoted the Sec. of Treasury for the cabinet of "presidente legitimo¨ Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (yup, he's still around) as pointing out that legally, this would allow Mexico to nationalize Banamex outright. Gonna be fun to watch."


* metaphor mixing is a sacred right of the blogger

New Update Post: Banamex, Itau and Citigroup: Rumours in the village