Click the figure below to see the geometry of McArthur River Uranium Mine, interactive satellite map and news.
Zoom at: McArthur River Uranium Mine.
Zoom at: McArthur River Uranium Mine.
Zoom at: Rossing Uranium Mine."More on Uranium Sector - These recent events are likely to lead developed nations to take a more cautious view regarding nuclear power, the governments of China , Russia and South Korea have all stated that the events in Japan will not affect those country's long term nuclear programs. However, China has suspended approvals for proposed nuclear power plants and is making a comprehensive safety check of atomic plants following Japan 's nuclear crisis, the State Council said overnight. The Council meeting chaired by Premier Wen Jiabao declared through a Statement that: “We will temporarily suspend approval of nuclear power projects, including those in the preliminary stages of development, pending the ratification of a new Nuclear Safety Plan and the revision/improvement of the Medium to Long-Term Nuclear Energy Development Plan… We must fully grasp the importance and urgency of nuclear safety, and development of nuclear power must make safety the top priority. We will use the most advanced standards to proceed with a safety assessment of all nuclear plants under construction. Any hazards must be thoroughly dealt with, and those that do not conform to safety standards must immediately cease construction.” China Strategist to Scotia Capital notes that the drafting and approval of a new Nuclear Safety Plan will likley take close to one year. Germany plans to shut down 7 nuclear reactors for a period of 3 months, pending a safety review would, in our estimates remove up to 1.0 Mlb of uranium demand in the context of a global market of roughly 195 Mlb. Remember that Asia (specifically China) and Eastern Europe (specifically Russia) represent 95% of the expected growth in reactor units between 2010 and 2015, and 86% of the expected growth between 2010 and 2020."
"And although Chinese approvals may be delayed, Scotia Mining Sales does not think this will materially change the long term goal of increasing reliance on nuclear power vs. coal."
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA AND JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA, March 16 /CNW/ - Uranium One Inc. ("Uranium One") today announced that JSC Atomredmetzoloto ("ARMZ") has notified Mantra Resources Limited ("Mantra") that ARMZ believes that the recent serious events at the nuclear power plant in Fukushima, Japan are likely to have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations, assets or liabilities, financial position or prospects of Mantra. As such, ARMZ considers that the condition precedent in the Scheme Implementation Agreement dated December 15, 2010 between ARMZ and Mantra relating to a material adverse change is not capable of being satisfied.ARMZ has indicated to Mantra that it intends to continue discussions with Mantra in an effort to explore how the transaction between two companies may proceed by way of an alternative approach.Uranium One will provide further updates as additional information becomes available.
PERTH, WESTERN AUSTRALIA--(Marketwire - March 16, 2011) - Paladin Energy Ltd. (TSX:PDN - News; ASX:PDN - News; "Paladin" or the "Company") expresses its deepest condolences to the people of Japan following the tragic events of Friday 11 March 2011. "We are very saddened by the catastrophic events and extreme loss of life following the dual natural disasters of an earthquake and tsunami", stated John Borshoff, Managing Director/CEO of Paladin. "We are encouraged that Fukushima plant managers are making public safety their highest priority and although the situation remains of grave concern it seems to be progressing slowly towards stabilisation of the damaged reactors".Paladin has had numerous queries regarding its business with Japan and the impact of recent events. While the Company endeavours to work with all participants in the nuclear sector and is developing a regional diversified sales portfolio, it does not currently have a commercial relationship with Japanese utilities. Paladin has a strong balance sheet with US$251.8M in cash as of 31 December 2010; is on track to produce 6Mlb to 6.3Mlb U3O8 in FY 2011; and commissioning of Langer Heinrich Mine Stage 3 expansion to 5.2Mlb U3O8 will occur in April giving the Company an installed capacity to provide 8.5Mlb U3O8 pa.Paladin continues to believe that the medium and long-term outlook for nuclear power remains positive and that recent events could further exacerbate the supply situation, ironically putting Paladin in an even better position with respect to global demand. There are more than 440 nuclear reactors operating safely around the world and growth of the fleet is assured with the 62 reactors currently under construction, with further expansion forecast from the emerging nuclear economies.Paladin will hold a conference call regarding the Japanese nuclear situation on Thursday 17 March details below (continues here)
Enter the wild cardLast week’s massive earthquake in Japan now presents one of those “now what happens?” events for world markets. Though not an ideal situation, part of analysis is to separate human distress factors from the cold, clinical world of money and markets and think about the financial consequences of moments such as this. Here, in a preliminary way, are a few thoughts on what might be in store for the metals end of business (the one junior miner portfolios care about):1) Uranium will sell off in the very-short-term and with it we’ll see selling of U producers and junior exploration plays. But let’s keep things real and note short, medium and long term scenarios (i.e. all with the potential for making or losing money) before we start running around waving our hands in the air. Short-term I expect U-exposed issues to drop, whether the exit be orderly or full-on dumpage, whether it be for knee-jerk or rational reasons. It matters not whether the sell-off is for rational or irrational reasons, from smart profit-taking of winning positions or from the we-are-all-gonna-die brigade. U will drop. Medium-term, my personal opinion it that it depends on which way China jumps. On that I call that China will keep on its aggressive U development on track, note how well the Japanese reactors have stood up to a 9.0mag quake on their doorstep, calm its own people (the only opinion that really matters to its Politburo) by noting the lack of tectonic plates where it’s planning to build its next generation of power suppliers, put a backbone in to the market and U gets back its mojo. Longer term is more of a world scale rather single country scale and the Fukushima situation gives energy policymakers another reason to look beyond uranium as mass scale generation of choice and towards alternative energy sources. This might be played up by sector interests in the coming weeks (solar companies may tell you to love solar now, geotherm likewise), so join any budding hype on those if you feel the need (repent at thy leisure afterwards...switchgrass, anyone?). So in other words, my only real call is for a short-term knee-jerk reaction to last week’s events and a wholesale dumpage of U stocks, which is a pretty pathetic analysis. As the timeline lengthens it’s tougher to make a proactive money call. My best guess is that uranium business might see some of the froth blown off but if bargains may appear at the quality end of the market they should be good trades for those with patience. Final point: As for the ‘sleeper facto’r of uranium stocks hardly moving last week even though talk had started to build about Japan’s nuclear power problems, it’s worth checking this screenshot below showing how the word “meltdown” didn’t trend much until after the Friday markets had closed. Then suddenly it was featured in between 1 and 3 of every 1000 tweets...and that’s a lot of tweeting, people. So get ready for your dose of irrational.As for gold (and therefore the other PMs or pseudo-PMs that follow its lead), my current playbook...
Zoom at: Macusani Uranium District.| Change in metals prices, July 20th to date (U$) | |||
| 20th July | Today | % change | |
| uranium | 46.50 | 49.25 | 5.91% |
| gold | 1183 | 1325 | 12.00% |
| copper | 3.28 | 3.80 | 15.85% |
| silver | 17.55 | 23.16 | 31.97% |
- Tradetech U3O8 +$1.25 to $46.75/lb: Well, the uranium spot price kicks off September with more volatility, clawing back some of last week’s fall in what can be only be dubbed a very active market (1.2mm lbs traded in the first 3 days of September).

The bottom line is that there's seemingly no supply squeeze on the horizon and it doesn't matter what the market shillers might think. Uranium gets pumped to no result from time to time and this time seems no different, just the reasons ("OMG!!! Chinese Stockpiling!!!") change. DYODD, dude.
- UxC Uranium Spot Price climbs most in 14 months: +$4.25/lb to $46/lb U3O8! Following Friday’s $2/lb move higher for Tradetech’s spot price indicator, last night UxC announced that its spot price increased by $4.25 to $46/lb U3O8 as demand picked up considerably over the past week while sellers backed away. Last night’s move is the largest single week increase since a $5/lb move higher in May 2009. However, UxC notes that over the last three years, no price increase has lasted longer than six weeks as the sharp moves higher scare off potential buyers. The big question: “is it different this time?”. Scotia Mining Sales thinks so, given the increased demand from China (as noted by the recent off take agreement with Cameco) and supply issues (ERA’s Ranger and ConverDyn’s Metropolis conversion facility). See our Chart of the Day below for uranium spot price vs. the uranium miners share price performance over the past couple years. While DML and UUU offer better torque to higher prices, don’t forget Cameco is the “go to” name for uranium.
Tradetech Uranium Spot Price +$2!!! Late on Friday, Tradetech reported that the spot price jumped by $2/lb to $43.50/lb, or nearly 5% which is the single largest increase since October 2009. This is quite an amazing move for the uranium market during the normally slow summer months. Tradetech noted that utilities, intermediaries and producers were all active in the market, looking to buy small amounts of inventory to offset any supply interruption owing to issues being experienced at ConverDyn’s conversion facility in Metropolis, Illinois (employees locked out since late June, equipment failures: ConverDyn is the only conversion facility in the U.S. (converts uranium in the form of yellowcake into UF6) and has a capacity of 15mm kg UF6 per year, or ~20% of global supply. A squeeze at the conversion stage can lead to higher uranium prices (i.e. a 3-month shut down at ConverDyn in late 2003 contributed to the 2004-2007 price spike, along with mine production issues at Olympic Dam and flooding at Cigar Lake ). Six month price performance of the uranium stocks has been pretty dismal, with the three companies in Scotia ’s coverage universe down 16-18% (see table below). Cameco (2-SP, C$31/sh target, Lawrence Smith) remains the go-to name for uranium “exposure” and is attractive at 1.14x NAV but Larry notes that Uranium One (UUU-CN, 2-SP, C$3.85/sh target) and Denison Mines (DML-CN, 2-SP, C$1.55/sh target) offer better torque to higher uranium prices with 16.3% and 14.1% sensitivity to a 10% move in uranium prices, vs. 6.7% for Cameco (see table below for valuation multiples and share price performance).

Nary a week seems to pass without uranium getting pumped as "just about to rocket". This week the baton passed to Amir Adnani, CEO of Uranium Energy Corp (UEC) that, COINCIDENTALLY, has seen its chart go all flat and boring and low-volumey recently.

Good point.
It would be interesting to create 2 commodity indices -- one containing
hoard-able commodities and the other non hoard-able commodities. Looking at
them together on a chart would be indicative of the "speculative" component
of the recent price rise.
Another non hoard-able commodity that I can think of at the top of my head
is nat gas. Look at that chart compared to U...
| Domain Name | iaea.org ? (Organization) | |||||||||||||||||||
| IP Address | 161.5.131.# (International Atomic Energy Centre (IAEA)) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ISP | International Atomic Energy Centre (IAEA) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Location |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Language | English (U.K.) en-gb | |||||||||||||||||||
| Operating System | Microsoft WinXP | |||||||||||||||||||
| Browser | Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; GTB6; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Javascript | version 1.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Monitor |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Time of Visit | | Nov 17 2009 9:26:13 am | ||||||||||||||||||
| Last Page View | Nov 17 2009 9:26:13 am | |||||||||||||||||||
| Visit Length | 0 seconds | |||||||||||||||||||
| Page Views | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Referring URL | http://www.google.co...R u308&start=50&sa=N | |||||||||||||||||||
| Search Engine | google.co.uk | |||||||||||||||||||
| Search Words | bolivia uranium min* yellowcake or u308 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Visit Entry Page | http://incakolanews....9_05_24_archive.html | |||||||||||||||||||
| Visit Exit Page | http://incakolanews....9_05_24_archive.html | |||||||||||||||||||
| Out Click | | |||||||||||||||||||
| Time Zone | UTC+1:00 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Visitor's Time | Nov 17 2009 4:26:13 pm |